The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to -4.7. Claude Opus 5.5 is 3.1x cheaper per token.

Anthropic · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 59.7 to -4.7, ranking #1 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Claude Opus 5.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Claude Opus 5.5 is roughly 3.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Claude Opus 5.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Claude Opus 5.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 59.7 and ranks #1 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 3.1x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Claude Opus 5.5
Anthropic
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
59.7
#1
-4.7
#356
Reasoning
57.8
#1
-5.5
#355
Coding
51.7
#1
-0.1
#248
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$4.00 / M
$20.00 / M
Output price
$20.00 / M
$40.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
32,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Claude Opus 5.5
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Math
42.5#5
-1.8#307
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for Claude Opus 5.5 · 18 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

1 shared

Claude Opus 5.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Global-MMLU), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is better at 0 benchmarks.

Claude Opus 5.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Claude Opus 5.5 costs less

For input processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($4.00/1M tokens) is 5.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($20.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Claude Opus 5.5 ($20.00/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed ($40.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is more expensive than Claude Opus 5.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input tokens$4.00
Output tokens$20.00
Best providerAnthropic
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input tokens$20.00
Output tokens$40.00
Best providerTogether
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Claude Opus 5.5 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's 32,000 tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 can generate longer responses up to 128,000 tokens, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is limited to 32,000 tokens.

Anthropic
Claude Opus 5.5
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Claude Opus 5.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Claude Opus 5.5

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Claude Opus 5.5 was released on 2026-09-22, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26.

Claude Opus 5.5 is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Claude Opus 5.5

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

1.2yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Claude Opus 5.5 has a knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Claude Opus 5.5 has more recent training data (up to 2026-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed (2024-06-01).

Claude Opus 5.5

Jun 2026

2 yr newer
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Provider Availability

Claude Opus 5.5 is available from Anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is available from Together.

Claude Opus 5.5

anthropic logo
Anthropic
Input Price:Input: $4.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $20.00/1M

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

together logo
Together
Input Price:Input: $20.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $40.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Claude Opus 5.5
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Claude Opus 5.5 vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Which is better, Claude Opus 5.5 or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 5.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 59.7 to -4.7. Claude Opus 5.5 is made by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Claude Opus 5.5 compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed in benchmarks?

Claude Opus 5.5 scores BenchCAD (with Python tool): 96.2%, Global-MMLU: 94.3%, SWE-bench Multilingual: 93.9%, MILU: 93.1%, ArXivMath: 91.2%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%.

Is Claude Opus 5.5 cheaper than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 5.5 is 5.0x cheaper for input tokens. Claude Opus 5.5 costs $4.00/M input and $20.00/M output via anthropic. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed costs $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output via together.

What are the context window sizes for Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 5.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (59.7 vs -4.7), context window (1.0M vs 32K), input pricing ($4.00 vs $20.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Claude Opus 5.5 and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed?

Claude Opus 5.5 is developed by Anthropic and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google.

Related comparisons