The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.7.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.7, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.7 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.7
#353
45.7
#29
Reasoning
-5.5
#351
43.2
#42
Coding
-0.1
#245
36.6
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,000
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

301.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 301.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 3762.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Flash's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.7 to -4.7. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.7 vs 45.7), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons