The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -4.7.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -4.7, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-4.7
#353
40.6
#57
Coding
-0.1
#245
34.1
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,000
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1012.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1012.0B more parameters than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed, making it 12650.0% larger.

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
8.0B
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 15 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.2 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.2yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to -4.7. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-4.7 vs 40.6), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons