The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Codestral-22B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Codestral-22B leads the LLM Stats Score 0.0 to -5.5.

Mistral AI · IBM · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Codestral-22B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 0.0 to -5.5, ranking #326 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Codestral-22B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 0.0 and ranks #326 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

Choose IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
0.0
#326
-5.5
#358
-0.1
#318
-5.5
#348
2.5
#225
3.0
#220
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

7 reported for Codestral-22B · 12 for IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

1 shared

Codestral-22B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is better at 1 benchmark (HumanEval).

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Sep 17 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

15.2B diff

Codestral-22B has 15.2B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview, making it 217.1% larger.

Mistral AI
Codestral-22B
22.2Bparameters
IBM
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
7.0Bparameters
22.2B
Codestral-22B
7.0B
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

License

Usage and distribution terms

Codestral-22B is licensed under MNPL-0.1, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Codestral-22B

MNPL-0.1

Open weights

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Codestral-22B was released on 2024-05-29, while IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview was released on 2025-05-02.

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is 11 months newer than Codestral-22B.

Codestral-22B

May 29, 2024

2.3 years ago

IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview

May 2, 2025

1.4 years ago

11mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Codestral-22B
✓ Preferred
IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Codestral-22B vs IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview.

Which is better, Codestral-22B or IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Codestral-22B leads the LLM Stats Score 0.0 to -5.5. Codestral-22B is made by Mistral AI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is made by IBM. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Codestral-22B compare to IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview in benchmarks?

Codestral-22B scores HumanEvalFIM-Average: 91.6%, HumanEval: 81.1%, MBPP: 78.2%, Spider: 63.5%, HumanEval-Average: 61.5%. IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview scores AttaQ: 86.1%, HumanEval: 82.4%, HumanEval+: 78.3%, GSM8k: 70.1%, IFEval: 63.0%.

What are the main differences between Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (0.0 vs -5.5), licensing (MNPL-0.1 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Codestral-22B and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview?

Codestral-22B is developed by Mistral AI and IBM Granite 4.0 Tiny Preview is developed by IBM.