The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 24.0.

Cohere · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 24.0, ranking #29 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Command A+

  • you are already invested in the Cohere ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Command A+
Cohere
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
24.0
#171
45.6
#29
Reasoning
21.5
#182
42.5
#45
Coding
7.3
#188
36.7
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

15 reported for Command A+ · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

91.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 91.0B more parameters than Command A+, making it 41.7% larger.

Cohere
Command A+
218.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
218.0B
Command A+
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Cohere
Command A+
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Command A+

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Command A+ is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Command A+

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Command A+ was released on 2026-05-20, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 4 months newer than Command A+.

Command A+

May 20, 2026

4 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Command A+
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Command A+ vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, Command A+ or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 24.0. Command A+ is made by Cohere and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Command A+ compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

Command A+ scores AIME 2025: 90.0%, CharXiv-D: 88.0%, MT-AIME 2025: 86.0%, Tau2 Telecom: 85.0%, WMT24++: 81.0%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Command A+ supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (24.0 vs 45.6), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Command A+ and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Command A+ is developed by Cohere and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons