Model Comparison

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs MedGemma 4B ITWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and MedGemma 4B IT across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs MedGemma 4B IT — which is better?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B (by DeepSeek) and MedGemma 4B IT (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B if…

  • you are already invested in the DeepSeek ecosystem

Choose MedGemma 4B IT if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and MedGemma 4B ITdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2.5B diff

MedGemma 4B IT has 2.5B more parameters than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B, making it 141.6% larger.

DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
1.8Bparameters
Google
MedGemma 4B IT
4.3Bparameters
1.8B
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
4.3B
MedGemma 4B IT

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

MedGemma 4B IT supports multimodal inputs, whereas DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B does not.

MedGemma 4B IT can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MedGemma 4B IT

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is licensed under MIT, while MedGemma 4B IT uses Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

MIT

Open weights

MedGemma 4B IT

Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B was released on 2025-01-20, while MedGemma 4B IT was released on 2025-05-20.

MedGemma 4B IT is 4 months newer than DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B.

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B

Jan 20, 2025

1.4 years ago

MedGemma 4B IT

May 20, 2025

1.1 years ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

DeepSeek

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Google
Supports multimodal inputs

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
DeepSeek
DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B
Google
MedGemma 4B IT

FAQ

Common questions about DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B vs MedGemma 4B IT.

Which is better, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B or MedGemma 4B IT?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B (DeepSeek) and MedGemma 4B IT (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B compare to MedGemma 4B IT in benchmarks?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B scores MATH-500: 83.9%, AIME 2024: 52.7%, GPQA: 33.8%, LiveCodeBench: 16.9%. MedGemma 4B IT scores MIMIC CXR: 88.9%, DermMCQA: 71.8%, PathMCQA: 69.8%, SlakeVQA: 62.3%, VQA-Rad: 49.9%.

What are the main differences between DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and MedGemma 4B IT?

Key differences include multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs Health AI Developer Foundations terms of use). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B and MedGemma 4B IT?

DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B is developed by DeepSeek and MedGemma 4B IT is developed by Google.

Related comparisons