Model Comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Hermes 3 70BWhich is better in 2026?
DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 is 1.4x cheaper per token.
Verdict: DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Hermes 3 70B — which is better?
DeepSeek-V3.1 (by DeepSeek) and Hermes 3 70B (by Nous Research) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.
DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks. DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
On price, DeepSeek-V3.1 is roughly 1.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V3.1 also accepts a larger context window (163,840 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Choose DeepSeek-V3.1 if…
- you want the strongest raw capability — it leads on 2 of 2 shared benchmarks
- cost matters — it's about 1.4x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 163,840 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jan 2025
Choose Hermes 3 70B if…
- you want predictable pricing at $0.35/M input and $1.40/M output
Performance Benchmarks
Comparative analysis across standard metrics
DeepSeek-V3.1 outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Hermes 3 70B is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V3.1 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Arena Performance
Human preference votes
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($0.27/1M tokens) is 1.3x cheaper than Hermes 3 70B ($0.35/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V3.1 ($1.00/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Hermes 3 70B ($1.40/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Hermes 3 70B is more expensive than DeepSeek-V3.1.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V3.1 has 601.0B more parameters than Hermes 3 70B, making it 858.6% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V3.1 accepts 163,840 input tokens compared to Hermes 3 70B's 131,072 tokens. DeepSeek-V3.1 can generate longer responses up to 163,840 tokens, while Hermes 3 70B is limited to 16,384 tokens.
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V3.1 is licensed under MIT, while Hermes 3 70B uses Apache 2.0.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Apache 2.0
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V3.1 was released on 2025-01-10, while Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15.
DeepSeek-V3.1 is 5 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.
Jan 10, 2025
1.4 years ago
4mo newerAug 15, 2024
1.8 years ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V3.1 is available from DeepInfra, Novita. Hermes 3 70B is available from DeepInfra.
DeepSeek-V3.1
Hermes 3 70B
Outputs Comparison
Key Takeaways
DeepSeek-V3.1
View detailsDeepSeek
Hermes 3 70B
View detailsNous Research
No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.
Detailed Comparison
| Feature |
|---|
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V3.1 vs Hermes 3 70B.