DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 35.0. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is 1.2x cheaper per token.
DeepSeek · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.8 to 35.0, ranking #20 overall.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is roughly 1.2x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,040,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 49.8 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 1.2x cheaper per token
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,040,000 token context window
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
20 reported for DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 0 benchmarks.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.22/1M tokens) is 1.1x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash ($0.66/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is more expensive than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash has 643.2B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B), making it 536.0% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash accepts 1,040,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash can generate longer responses up to 393,216 tokens, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is limited to 262,144 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
License
Usage and distribution terms
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash was released on 2026-09-10, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 1 month newer than DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash.
Sep 10, 2026
1 months ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash is available from Fireworks, DeepInfra, Novita. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.
DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).
Related comparisons
More DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Wonder