Model Comparison

Devstral Medium vs Gemini 3.5 Flash CyberWhich is better in 2026?

Comparing Devstral Medium and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Verdict: Devstral Medium vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber — which is better?

Devstral Medium (by Mistral AI) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (by Google) are two of the AI models people compare most. Here is how they stack up on benchmarks, price and capabilities, and which one to pick in 2026.

Choose Devstral Medium if…

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.40/M input and $2.00/M output

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber if…

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2026

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

No common benchmarks found

Devstral Medium and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyberdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Devstral Medium specifies input context (128,000 tokens). Only Devstral Medium specifies output context (128,000 tokens).

Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Input128,000 tokens
Output128,000 tokens
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Jul 26 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Devstral Medium

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Devstral Medium was released on 2025-07-10, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is 13 months newer than Devstral Medium.

Devstral Medium

Jul 10, 2025

1.0 years ago

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

4 days ago

1.0yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Mistral AI
Larger context window (128,000 tokens)
Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Detailed Comparison

Interactive Arena

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Devstral Medium and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Devstral Medium
✓ Preferred
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Open in Playground
AI Model Comparison Table
Feature
Mistral AI
Devstral Medium
Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

FAQ

Common questions about Devstral Medium vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Which is better, Devstral Medium or Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Devstral Medium (Mistral AI) and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber (Google) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does Devstral Medium compare to Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber in benchmarks?

Devstral Medium scores SWE-Bench Verified: 61.6%. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Devstral Medium and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Devstral Medium supports 128K tokens and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

Who makes Devstral Medium and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber?

Devstral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google.

Related comparisons