The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched at 37.6 and 40.6 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 40.6.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

  • you are already invested in the Google ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Google
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
37.6
#70
40.6
#57
Coding
30.2
#54
34.1
#35
Agents
26.9
#49
29.9
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 40.6. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (37.6 vs 40.6), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons