The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Grok 4.7

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7 are closely matched at 37.6 and 48.5 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 48.5.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Grok 4.7

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Google
Grok 4.7
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
37.6
#70
48.5
#22
Coding
30.2
#54
40.1
#13
Agents
26.9
#49
36.3
#18
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
— / M
$2.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$6.00 / M
Context window
—
500,000

Individual benchmarks

1 reported for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber · 23 for Grok 4.7

1 shared

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CyberGym), while Grok 4.7 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok 4.7 specifies input context (500,000 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok 4.7
Input500,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Sep 21 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Grok 4.7 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber does not.

Grok 4.7 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok 4.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok 4.7

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-07-21, while Grok 4.7 was released on 2026-09-21.

Grok 4.7 is 2 months newer than Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

Jul 21, 2026

2 months ago

Grok 4.7

Sep 21, 2026

0 days ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok 4.7 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-06-01, while Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok 4.7's training data extends to 2026-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber

—

Grok 4.7

Jun 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
Grok 4.7
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber vs Grok 4.7.

Which is better, Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber or Grok 4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 37.6 and 48.5. Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is made by Google and Grok 4.7 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber compare to Grok 4.7 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber scores CyberGym: 83.2%. Grok 4.7 scores BixBench MCQ: 88.4%, WMDP-Bio: 88.1%, WMDP-Cyber: 88.1%, WMDP-Chem: 84.9%, CyberGym: 80.3%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok 4.7 supports 500K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (37.6 vs 48.5), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber and Grok 4.7?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and Grok 4.7 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons