The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 0.4.

Fireworks AI · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 0.4, ranking #51 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.1 and ranks #51 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.1
#51
0.4
#340
Reasoning
38.6
#72
0.1
#333
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 11 for Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2710.0B diff

Ember-1 has 2710.0B more parameters than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct, making it 3871.4% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
70.0Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
70.0B
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 08 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct uses Llama 3.1 Community License.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Llama 3.1 Community License

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct was released on 2024-10-01.

Ember-1 is 24 months newer than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

2.0yr newer
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Oct 1, 2024

2.0 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-01, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.

Ember-1

—

Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct

Dec 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.1 to 0.4. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct scores GSM8k: 91.4%, HellaSwag: 85.6%, Winogrande: 84.5%, GSM8K Chat: 81.9%, MMLU Chat: 80.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.1 vs 0.4), licensing (Proprietary vs Llama 3.1 Community License). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 70B Instruct is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons