The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Ember-1 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -0.3.

Fireworks AI · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Ember-1 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -0.3, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Ember-1

  • overall performance matters — it scores 43.6 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Mistral Small 3 24B Base

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Ember-1
Fireworks AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
43.6
#46
-0.3
#342
Reasoning
38.6
#71
-0.3
#336
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$3.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$15.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,040,000
—

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Ember-1 · 9 for Mistral Small 3 24B Base

No common benchmarks found

Ember-1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Basedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

2756.4B diff

Ember-1 has 2756.4B more parameters than Mistral Small 3 24B Base, making it 11679.7% larger.

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
2.8Tparameters
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
23.6Bparameters
2780.0B
Ember-1
23.6B
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Ember-1 specifies input context (1,040,000 tokens).

Fireworks AI
Ember-1
Input1,040,000 tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Wed Oct 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ember-1 does not.

Mistral Small 3 24B Base can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Ember-1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Ember-1 is licensed under a proprietary license, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Ember-1

Proprietary

Closed source

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Ember-1 was released on 2026-09-23, while Mistral Small 3 24B Base was released on 2025-01-30.

Ember-1 is 20 months newer than Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Ember-1

Sep 23, 2026

2 weeks ago

1.6yr newer
Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Jan 30, 2025

1.7 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Mistral Small 3 24B Base has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-10-01, while Ember-1's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Mistral Small 3 24B Base's training data extends to 2023-10-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Ember-1's cutoff date.

Ember-1

—

Mistral Small 3 24B Base

Oct 2023

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Ember-1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Ember-1
✓ Preferred
Mistral Small 3 24B Base
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Ember-1 vs Mistral Small 3 24B Base.

Which is better, Ember-1 or Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Ember-1 leads the LLM Stats Score 43.6 to -0.3. Ember-1 is made by Fireworks AI and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Ember-1 compare to Mistral Small 3 24B Base in benchmarks?

Ember-1 scores SWE-Bench Verified: 92.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 82.0%, DeepSWE 1.1: 75.2%, Tau2 Airline: 66.0%. Mistral Small 3 24B Base scores ARC-C: 91.3%, GSM8k: 80.7%, MMLU: 80.7%, TriviaQA: 80.3%, MBPP: 69.6%.

What are the context window sizes for Ember-1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Ember-1 supports 1.0M tokens and Mistral Small 3 24B Base supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Ember-1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (43.6 vs -0.3), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Ember-1 and Mistral Small 3 24B Base?

Ember-1 is developed by Fireworks AI and Mistral Small 3 24B Base is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons