The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview are closely matched at -5.3 and -5.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at -5.3 and -5.0.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 1.0 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 1.0 Pro

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped May 2025
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.3
#345
-5.0
#344
Reasoning
-7.9
#343
-5.8
#338
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.50 / M
— / M
Output price
$1.50 / M
— / M
Context window
32,760
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Math
-1.4#296
-0.9#293
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

9 reported for Gemini 1.0 Pro · 28 for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

2 shared

Gemini 1.0 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU), while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 1.0 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies input context (32,760 tokens). Only Gemini 1.0 Pro specifies output context (8,192 tokens).

Google
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Input32,760 tokens
Output8,192 tokens
Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Sep 04 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 1.0 Pro does not.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 1.0 Pro is licensed under a proprietary license, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview uses Gemma.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 1.0 Pro was released on 2024-02-15, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is 15 months newer than Gemini 1.0 Pro.

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 15, 2024

2.6 years ago

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 1.0 Pro has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-02-01, while Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a cutoff of 2024-06-01.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has more recent training data (up to 2024-06-01), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemini 1.0 Pro (2024-02-01).

Gemini 1.0 Pro

Feb 2024

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

4 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 1.0 Pro
✓ Preferred
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Which is better, Gemini 1.0 Pro or Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at -5.3 and -5.0. Gemini 1.0 Pro is made by Google and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 1.0 Pro compare to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview in benchmarks?

Gemini 1.0 Pro scores FLEURS: 93.6%, BIG-Bench: 75.0%, MMLU: 71.8%, WMT23: 71.7%, EgoSchema: 55.7%. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Gemini 1.0 Pro supports 33K tokens and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.3 vs -5.0), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs Gemma). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Related comparisons