The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) are closely matched at 36.7 and 35.0 on the LLM Stats Score. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2.8x cheaper per token.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 36.7 and 35.0.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3 Flash wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is roughly 2.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 3 Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

  • cost matters — it's about 2.8x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3 Flash
Google
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
36.7
#93
35.0
#108
Reasoning
37.6
#83
36.2
#94
Coding
22.2
#98
21.0
#108
Agents
17.6
#92
16.5
#99
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$0.50 / M
$0.20 / M
Output price
$3.00 / M
$1.00 / M
Context window
1,000,000
262,144

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

4 shared
Index
Gemini 3 Flash
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Math
37.2#34
28.1#101
Vision
25.5#60
20.3#86
Tool use
15.5#104
11.0#133
Multimodal
26.6#51
22.0#76
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

24 reported for Gemini 3 Flash · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

4 shared

Gemini 3 Flash outperforms in 3 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (CharXiv-R).

Gemini 3 Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($0.50/1M tokens) is 2.5x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3 Flash ($3.00/1M tokens) is 3.0x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3 Flash is more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input tokens$0.50
Output tokens$3.00
Best providerGoogle
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input tokens$0.20
Output tokens$1.00
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 3 Flash accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s 262,144 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Gemini 3 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3 Flash was released on 2025-12-17, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 10 months newer than Gemini 3 Flash.

Gemini 3 Flash

Dec 17, 2025

10 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

10mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-31, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3 Flash's training data extends to 2025-01-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)'s cutoff date.

Gemini 3 Flash

Jan 2025

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3 Flash is available from Google. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.

Gemini 3 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.50/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.20/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3 Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3 Flash vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).

Which is better, Gemini 3 Flash or Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 36.7 and 35.0. Gemini 3 Flash is made by Google and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3 Flash compare to Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) in benchmarks?

Gemini 3 Flash scores Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, AIME 2025: 99.7%, Global PIQA: 92.8%, MMMLU: 91.8%, GPQA: 90.4%. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) scores GPQA: 89.5%, LiveCodeBench v6: 88.2%, CharXiv-R: 80.8%, MathVision: 78.2%, BrowseComp: 78.0%.

Is Gemini 3 Flash cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 2.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3 Flash costs $0.50/M input and $3.00/M output via google. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) costs $0.20/M input and $1.00/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) supports 262K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (36.7 vs 35.0), context window (1.0M vs 262K), input pricing ($0.50 vs $0.20/M), licensing (Proprietary vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3 Flash and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)?

Gemini 3 Flash is developed by Google and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons