The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 35.4. MiMo-V2.5 is 7.1x cheaper per token.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 35.4, ranking #15 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 3.8 Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2.5 is roughly 7.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 51.0 and ranks #15 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • cost matters — it's about 7.1x cheaper per token
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
Google
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
51.0
#15
35.4
#82
Reasoning
46.9
#24
35.5
#75
Coding
39.3
#14
27.0
#57
Agents
35.8
#16
18.7
#60
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.75 / M
$0.17 / M
Output price
$3.75 / M
$0.34 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Gemini 3.8 Flash
MiMo-V2.5
Vision
33.8#15
23.2#54
Multimodal
34.8#12
25.1#47
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

13 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash · 14 for MiMo-V2.5

1 shared

Gemini 3.8 Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CharXiv-R), while MiMo-V2.5 is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemini 3.8 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.5 costs less

For input processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($0.75/1M tokens) is 4.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5 ($0.17/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 3.8 Flash ($3.75/1M tokens) is 11.2x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5 ($0.34/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 3.8 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.75
Output tokens$3.75
Best providerGoogle
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input tokens$0.17
Output tokens$0.34
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. MiMo-V2.5 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Gemini 3.8 Flash is limited to 65,536 tokens.

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output65,536 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash was released on 2026-09-02, while MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22.

Gemini 3.8 Flash is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

4mo newer
MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemini 3.8 Flash has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-03-31, while MiMo-V2.5's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemini 3.8 Flash's training data extends to 2026-03-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5's cutoff date.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

Mar 2026

MiMo-V2.5

—

Provider Availability

Gemini 3.8 Flash is available from Google. MiMo-V2.5 is available from Novita, DeepInfra.

Gemini 3.8 Flash

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $0.75/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.75/1M

MiMo-V2.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash vs MiMo-V2.5.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 51.0 to 35.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash is made by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash compare to MiMo-V2.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.4%, LVBench: 87.1%, CharXiv-R: 86.2%, LABBench2: 86.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%. MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%.

Is Gemini 3.8 Flash cheaper than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is 4.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 3.8 Flash costs $0.75/M input and $3.75/M output via google. MiMo-V2.5 costs $0.17/M input and $0.34/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (51.0 vs 35.4), input pricing ($0.75 vs $0.17/M), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons