The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.5

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 35.4.

Google · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the overall LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 35.4, ranking #46 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

  • overall performance matters — it scores 42.4 and ranks #46 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Google
MiMo-V2.5
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
42.4
#46
35.4
#82
Coding
35.6
#25
27.0
#57
Agents
31.2
#27
18.7
#60
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.17 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.34 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

4 reported for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber · 14 for MiMo-V2.5

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.5don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Google
Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber does not.

MiMo-V2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is licensed under a proprietary license, while MiMo-V2.5 uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Proprietary

Closed source

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber was released on 2026-09-02, while MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber

Sep 2, 2026

3 days ago

4mo newer
MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

4 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.5 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber vs MiMo-V2.5.

Which is better, Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber or MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber leads the LLM Stats Score 42.4 to 35.4. Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is made by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber compare to MiMo-V2.5 in benchmarks?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 94.0%, CyberGym: 86.2%, Google Real-world Vulnerability Discovery: 71.0%, CWE-Bench: 47.2%. MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.5?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (42.4 vs 35.4), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Proprietary vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber and MiMo-V2.5?

Gemini 3.8 Flash Cyber is developed by Google and MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons