The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5 vs Parse

Comparing MiMo-V2.5 and Parse across benchmarks, pricing, and capabilities.

Xiaomi · Cohere · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5 and Parse trade strengths across price, capabilities, and technical limits. The better choice depends on the workload.

MiMo-V2.5 also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5

  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Parse

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Aug 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Benchmark wins
Input price
$0.17 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
8,192

Individual benchmarks

14 reported for MiMo-V2.5 · 1 for Parse

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.5 and Parsedon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

308.5B diff

MiMo-V2.5 has 308.5B more parameters than Parse, making it 13412.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
310.8Bparameters
Cohere
Parse
2.3Bparameters
310.8B
MiMo-V2.5
2.3B
Parse

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.5 accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Parse's 8,192 tokens. Only MiMo-V2.5 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Cohere
Parse
Input8,192 tokens
Output- tokens
Sat Sep 05 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.5 and Parse support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Parse

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5 is licensed under MIT, while Parse uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5

MIT

Open weights

Parse

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5 was released on 2026-04-22, while Parse was released on 2026-08-27.

Parse is 4 months newer than MiMo-V2.5.

MiMo-V2.5

Apr 22, 2026

4 months ago

Parse

Aug 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.5 is available from Novita, DeepInfra. Parse is available from Azure, Cohere.

MiMo-V2.5

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.17/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.34/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.40/1MOutput Price:Output: $2.00/1M

Parse

azure logo
Azure
cohere logo
Cohere
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5 and Parse side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5
✓ Preferred
Parse
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5 vs Parse.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5 or Parse?

MiMo-V2.5 (Xiaomi) and Parse (Cohere) each have strengths in different areas. Compare their benchmark scores, pricing, context windows, and capabilities above to determine which fits your needs.

How does MiMo-V2.5 compare to Parse in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5 scores HR-Bench (4k): 88.5%, Video-MME: 87.7%, OmniDocBench: 87.2%, GraphWalks: 87.0%, DailyOmni: 83.5%. Parse scores ParseBench: 79.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5 and Parse?

MiMo-V2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and Parse supports 8K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5 and Parse?

Key differences include context window (1.0M vs 8K), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5 and Parse?

MiMo-V2.5 is developed by Xiaomi and Parse is developed by Cohere.