The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 4 Carbon

Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon are closely matched at 54.4 and 59.0 on the LLM Stats Score.

Google · Google · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 54.4 and 59.0.

In the 8 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Carbon wins 8; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • you want predictable pricing at $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output

Choose Gemini 4 Carbon

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 8 of 8 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
54.4
#6
59.0
#2
52.0
#8
54.9
#5
43.2
#8
48.1
#3
41.5
#6
46.0
#2
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 8
8 of 8
Input price
$2.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Gemini 4 Carbon
36.2#10
36.0#12
32.4#6
35.8#3
36.3#10
38.0#6
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 16 for Gemini 4 Carbon

8 shared

Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Gemini 4 Carbon is better at 8 benchmarks (AutomationBench, Chartography (no tools), CWE-Bench, FrontierSWE V2, Graphwalks BFS >128k, RiemannBench, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1, Vals Index).

Gemini 4 Carbon significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemini 4 Argon specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only Gemini 4 Argon specifies output context (1,048,576 tokens).

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Google
Gemini 4 Carbon
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 29 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Gemini 4 Carbon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Gemini 4 Carbon

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Gemini 4 Carbon was released on 2026-10-28.

Gemini 4 Carbon is 1 month newer than Gemini 4 Argon.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

3 weeks ago

Gemini 4 Carbon

Oct 28, 2026

-1 days ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Gemini 4 Carbon
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Gemini 4 Carbon.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 54.4 and 59.0. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Gemini 4 Carbon is made by Google. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Gemini 4 Carbon in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Gemini 4 Carbon scores Gray Swan IPI Benchmark: 100.0%, Vending-Bench 2: 100.0%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 96.2%, WebDev Arena: 88.4%, SEC-bench Pro: 88.2%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1.0M tokens and Gemini 4 Carbon supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Gemini 4 Carbon?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (54.4 vs 59.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.