The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok-4

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 33.5. Gemini 4 Argon is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 33.5, ranking #4 overall.

On price, Gemini 4 Argon is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 4 Argon also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Grok-4

  • you want predictable pricing at $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
55.1
#4
33.5
#119
53.2
#6
32.7
#120
42.5
#7
17.1
#142
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$2.00 / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
1,048,576
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Grok-4
37.2#8
18.9#94
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 7 for Grok-4

No common benchmarks found

Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Gemini 4 Argon costs less

For input processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Grok-4 ($3.00/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens) is 1.5x cheaper than Grok-4 ($15.00/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Grok-4 is more expensive than Gemini 4 Argon.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
xAI
Grok-4
Input tokens$3.00
Output tokens$15.00
Best providerxAI
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Grok-4's 256,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Grok-4 is limited to 8,000 tokens.

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.

Gemini 4 Argon is 15 months newer than Grok-4.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

3 weeks ago

1.2yr newer
Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

1.3 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Grok-4 has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-12-31, while Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Grok-4's training data extends to 2024-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Gemini 4 Argon's cutoff date.

Gemini 4 Argon

—

Grok-4

Dec 2024

Provider Availability

Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google. Grok-4 is available from xAI.

Gemini 4 Argon

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Grok-4

xai logo
xAI
Input Price:Input: $3.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $15.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Grok-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Grok-4.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Grok-4?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 33.5. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Grok-4 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Grok-4 in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%.

Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than Grok-4?

Gemini 4 Argon is 1.5x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Grok-4 costs $3.00/M input and $15.00/M output via xai.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4?

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1.0M tokens and Grok-4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 33.5), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $3.00/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Grok-4?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Grok-4 is developed by xAI.