The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Flash

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 48.1. Qwen3.8 Flash is 17.4x cheaper per token.

Google · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 48.1, ranking #4 overall.

In the 4 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemini 4 Argon wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Qwen3.8 Flash is roughly 17.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Gemini 4 Argon also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemini 4 Argon

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.1 and ranks #4 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 4 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Qwen3.8 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 17.4x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemini 4 Argon
Google
Qwen3.8 Flash
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.1
#4
48.1
#32
Reasoning
53.2
#6
48.4
#21
Coding
42.5
#7
33.1
#43
Agents
41.2
#4
32.8
#36
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
3 of 4
1 of 4
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.47 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
Gemini 4 Argon
Qwen3.8 Flash
Vision
37.2#8
33.9#19
Tool use
32.3#4
29.9#12
Multimodal
37.2#7
35.3#13
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

19 reported for Gemini 4 Argon · 22 for Qwen3.8 Flash

4 shared

Gemini 4 Argon outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, LVBench, OSWorld 2.0), while Qwen3.8 Flash is better at 1 benchmark (Agents' Last Exam).

Gemini 4 Argon shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Qwen3.8 Flash costs less

For input processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($2.00/1M tokens) is 13.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, Gemini 4 Argon ($10.00/1M tokens) is 21.3x more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash ($0.47/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Gemini 4 Argon is more expensive than Qwen3.8 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com
Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerGoogle
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.47
Best providerNovita
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Gemini 4 Argon accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Qwen3.8 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Gemini 4 Argon can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Qwen3.8 Flash is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Google
Gemini 4 Argon
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen3.8 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemini 4 Argon

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen3.8 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemini 4 Argon

Proprietary

Closed source

Qwen3.8 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemini 4 Argon was released on 2026-09-30, while Qwen3.8 Flash was released on 2026-08-26.

Gemini 4 Argon is 1 month newer than Qwen3.8 Flash.

Gemini 4 Argon

Sep 30, 2026

3 weeks ago

1mo newer
Qwen3.8 Flash

Aug 26, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Gemini 4 Argon is available from Google. Qwen3.8 Flash is available from Novita.

Gemini 4 Argon

google logo
Google
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Qwen3.8 Flash

novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.47/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemini 4 Argon
✓ Preferred
Qwen3.8 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemini 4 Argon vs Qwen3.8 Flash.

Which is better, Gemini 4 Argon or Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 4 Argon leads the LLM Stats Score 55.1 to 48.1. Gemini 4 Argon is made by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemini 4 Argon compare to Qwen3.8 Flash in benchmarks?

Gemini 4 Argon scores Graphwalks BFS <128k: 99.7%, Vibe Code Bench: 91.9%, LVBench: 91.7%, LABBench2: 88.8%, Graphwalks BFS >128k: 84.2%. Qwen3.8 Flash scores MathVision: 95.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 91.9%, GPQA: 91.7%, CharXiv-R: 90.6%, RealWorldQA: 88.5%.

Is Gemini 4 Argon cheaper than Qwen3.8 Flash?

Qwen3.8 Flash is 13.3x cheaper for input tokens. Gemini 4 Argon costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via google. Qwen3.8 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.47/M output via novita.

What are the context window sizes for Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 4 Argon supports 1.0M tokens and Qwen3.8 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.1 vs 48.1), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.15/M). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemini 4 Argon and Qwen3.8 Flash?

Gemini 4 Argon is developed by Google and Qwen3.8 Flash is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons