Model Comparison

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Want to compare interactively?Try the playground

Performance Benchmarks

Comparative analysis across standard metrics

6 benchmarks

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is better at 6 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, Include, MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MMLU-ProX).

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Arena Performance

Human preference votes

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

29.1B diff

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct has 29.1B more parameters than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview), making it 1523.0% larger.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

1.9Bparameters

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

31.0Bparameters

1.9B

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

31.0B

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct specifies output context (32,768 tokens).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Input- tokens

Output- tokens

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Input131,072 tokens

Output32,768 tokens

Fri May 15 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input Capabilities

Supported data types and modalities

Both Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Text

Images

Audio

Video

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Text

Images

Audio

Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is licensed under Gemma, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Gemma

Open weights

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) was released on 2025-05-20, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct was released on 2025-09-22.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is 4 months newer than Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview).

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

May 20, 2025

12 months ago

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

Sep 22, 2025

7 months ago

4mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)'s training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

Jun 2024

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Key Takeaways

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)

View details

Google

No standout differentiators in the data we have for this pair.

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

View details

Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team

Larger context window (131,072 tokens)

Higher AIME 2025 score (69.3% vs 6.7%)

Higher GPQA score (70.4% vs 24.8%)

Higher Include score (71.6% vs 38.6%)

Higher MMLU score (85.0% vs 60.1%)

Higher MMLU-Pro score (77.8% vs 40.5%)

Higher MMLU-ProX score (70.9% vs 8.1%)

Detailed Comparison

AI Model Comparison Table
Feature	Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview)	Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) vs Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) or Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct significantly outperforms across most benchmarks. Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is made by Google and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their benchmark scores, pricing, and capabilities above.

How does Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) compare to Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) scores PIQA: 78.9%, BoolQ: 76.4%, ARC-E: 75.8%, HellaSwag: 72.2%, Winogrande: 66.8%. Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct scores DocVQAtest: 95.0%, ScreenSpot: 94.7%, OCRBench: 90.3%, MMLU-Redux: 88.4%, MMBench-V1.1: 87.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) supports an unknown number of tokens and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Key differences include licensing (Gemma vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct?

Gemma 3n E2B Instructed LiteRT (Preview) is developed by Google and Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.