The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Grok-4

Grok-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -5.2.

Google · xAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Grok-4 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -5.2, ranking #97 overall.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Grok-4 wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Grok-4

  • overall performance matters — it scores 33.7 and ranks #97 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jul 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Google
Grok-4
xAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.2
#355
33.7
#97
Reasoning
-5.9
#350
32.9
#100
Coding
-0.1
#240
17.3
#121
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 3
3 of 3
Input price
— / M
$3.00 / M
Output price
— / M
$15.00 / M
Context window
—
256,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Grok-4
Math
-1.3#302
31.4#67
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

28 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview · 7 for Grok-4

3 shared

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Grok-4 is better at 3 benchmarks (AIME 2025, GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Grok-4 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Grok-4 specifies input context (256,000 tokens). Only Grok-4 specifies output context (8,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
xAI
Grok-4
Input256,000 tokens
Output8,000 tokens
Sun Sep 13 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Grok-4 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Grok-4

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is licensed under Gemma, while Grok-4 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Gemma

Open weights

Grok-4

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview was released on 2025-05-20, while Grok-4 was released on 2025-07-09.

Grok-4 is 2 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

May 20, 2025

1.3 years ago

Grok-4

Jul 9, 2025

1.2 years ago

1mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview has a knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Grok-4 has a cutoff of 2024-12-31.

Grok-4 has more recent training data (up to 2024-12-31), making it potentially better informed about events through that date compared to Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview (2024-06-01).

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview

Jun 2024

Grok-4

Dec 2024

6 mo newer

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Grok-4 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview
✓ Preferred
Grok-4
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview vs Grok-4.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview or Grok-4?

Grok-4 leads the LLM Stats Score 33.7 to -5.2. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is made by Google and Grok-4 is made by xAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview compare to Grok-4 in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview scores ARC-E: 81.6%, BoolQ: 81.6%, PIQA: 81.0%, HellaSwag: 78.6%, HumanEval: 75.0%. Grok-4 scores AIME 2025: 91.7%, HMMT25: 90.0%, GPQA: 87.5%, LiveCodeBench: 79.0%, Humanity's Last Exam: 40.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Grok-4?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview supports an unknown number of tokens and Grok-4 supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Grok-4?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.2 vs 33.7), licensing (Gemma vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview and Grok-4?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed LiteRT Preview is developed by Google and Grok-4 is developed by xAI.

Related comparisons