The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Muse Wonder

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to -5.0.

Google · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Muse Wonder leads the overall LLM Stats Score 49.2 to -5.0, ranking #25 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

  • you want predictable pricing at $20.00/M input and $40.00/M output

Choose Muse Wonder

  • overall performance matters — it scores 49.2 and ranks #25 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Google
Muse Wonder
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
-5.0
#374
49.2
#25
Reasoning
-5.8
#373
37.7
#81
Coding
-0.2
#264
38.2
#21
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$20.00 / M
— / M
Output price
$40.00 / M
— / M
Context window
32,000
—

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed · 16 for Muse Wonder

No common benchmarks found

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonderdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies input context (32,000 tokens). Only Gemma 3n E4B Instructed specifies output context (32,000 tokens).

Google
Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
Input32,000 tokens
Output32,000 tokens
Meta
Muse Wonder
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Tue Oct 20 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonder support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Wonder

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under proprietary licenses.

Both models have usage restrictions defined by their respective organizations.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Proprietary

Closed source

Muse Wonder

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed was released on 2025-06-26, while Muse Wonder was released on 2026-10-12.

Muse Wonder is 16 months newer than Gemma 3n E4B Instructed.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 26, 2025

1.3 years ago

Muse Wonder

Oct 12, 2026

5 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2024-06-01, while Muse Wonder's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 3n E4B Instructed's training data extends to 2024-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Muse Wonder's cutoff date.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed

Jun 2024

Muse Wonder

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonder side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed
✓ Preferred
Muse Wonder
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 3n E4B Instructed vs Muse Wonder.

Which is better, Gemma 3n E4B Instructed or Muse Wonder?

Muse Wonder leads the LLM Stats Score 49.2 to -5.0. Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is made by Google and Muse Wonder is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 3n E4B Instructed compare to Muse Wonder in benchmarks?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed scores HumanEval: 75.0%, MGSM: 67.0%, MMLU: 64.9%, Global-MMLU-Lite: 64.5%, MBPP: 63.6%. Muse Wonder scores MemoryBench: 85.6%, DeepSWE 1.1: 78.8%, OSWorld 2.1 (partial): 72.6%, JobBench: 70.5%, HealthBench Professional: 60.5%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed supports 32K tokens and Muse Wonder supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonder?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (-5.0 vs 49.2). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 3n E4B Instructed and Muse Wonder?

Gemma 3n E4B Instructed is developed by Google and Muse Wonder is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons