The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Gemma 4 31B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Gemma 4 31B leads the LLM Stats Score 33.0 to 22.1.

Google · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Gemma 4 31B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 33.0 to 22.1, ranking #121 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Gemma 4 31B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Gemma 4 31B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 33.0 and ranks #121 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Gemma 4 31B
Google
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
33.0
#121
22.1
#202
Reasoning
33.5
#113
19.8
#213
Agents
13.7
#112
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 2
0 of 2
Input price
$0.09 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.34 / M
— / M
Context window
262,144
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Gemma 4 31B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
29.5#90
12.2#245
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Gemma 4 31B · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

2 shared

Gemma 4 31B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

Gemma 4 31B significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

26.7B diff

Gemma 4 31B has 26.7B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 667.5% larger.

Google
Gemma 4 31B
30.7Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
30.7B
Gemma 4 31B
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Gemma 4 31B specifies input context (262,144 tokens). Only Gemma 4 31B specifies output context (262,144 tokens).

Google
Gemma 4 31B
Input262,144 tokens
Output262,144 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Gemma 4 31B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

Gemma 4 31B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Gemma 4 31B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Gemma 4 31B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Gemma 4 31B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Gemma 4 31B was released on 2026-04-02, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 7 months newer than Gemma 4 31B.

Gemma 4 31B

Apr 2, 2026

6 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

6mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Gemma 4 31B has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-01-01, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Gemma 4 31B's training data extends to 2025-01-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)'s cutoff date.

Gemma 4 31B

Jan 2025

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

—

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Gemma 4 31B
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Gemma 4 31B vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, Gemma 4 31B or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemma 4 31B leads the LLM Stats Score 33.0 to 22.1. Gemma 4 31B is made by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Gemma 4 31B compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

Gemma 4 31B scores AIME 2026: 89.2%, MMMLU: 88.4%, t2-bench: 86.4%, MathVision: 85.6%, MMLU-Pro: 85.2%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemma 4 31B supports 262K tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (33.0 vs 22.1), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Gemma 4 31B and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Gemma 4 31B is developed by Google and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons