The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

IBM Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 19.3. IBM Granite 4.2 8B is 1.6x cheaper per token.

IBM · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 19.3, ranking #45 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, IBM Granite 4.2 8B is roughly 1.6x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose IBM Granite 4.2 8B

  • cost matters — it's about 1.6x cheaper per token

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.8 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B
IBM
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
19.3
#224
44.8
#45
Reasoning
17.1
#235
43.6
#50
Coding
2.8
#245
34.0
#37
Agents
2.7
#188
32.0
#38
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 1
1 of 1
Input price
$0.06 / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
$0.25 / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
131,072
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Tool use
2.4#189
26.4#33
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for IBM Granite 4.2 8B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

1 shared

IBM Granite 4.2 8B outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash is better at 1 benchmark (Terminal-Bench 2.1).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

IBM Granite 4.2 8B costs less

For input processing, IBM Granite 4.2 8B ($0.06/1M tokens) is 2.3x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens).

For output processing, IBM Granite 4.2 8B ($0.25/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is more expensive than IBM Granite 4.2 8B.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.25
Best providerDeepinfra
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

301.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 301.0B more parameters than IBM Granite 4.2 8B, making it 3762.5% larger.

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
8.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
8.0B
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to IBM Granite 4.2 8B's 131,072 tokens. Only IBM Granite 4.2 8B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

IBM
IBM Granite 4.2 8B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas IBM Granite 4.2 8B does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

IBM Granite 4.2 8B is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

IBM Granite 4.2 8B was released on 2026-08-25, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1 month newer than IBM Granite 4.2 8B.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

Aug 25, 2026

1 months ago

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

3 weeks ago

4w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

IBM Granite 4.2 8B is available from DeepInfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.25/1M

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against IBM Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

IBM Granite 4.2 8B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about IBM Granite 4.2 8B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, IBM Granite 4.2 8B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 19.3. IBM Granite 4.2 8B is made by IBM and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does IBM Granite 4.2 8B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

IBM Granite 4.2 8B scores AIME 2025: 86.7%, RULER 64k: 81.0%, IFBench: 79.3%, HMMT25: 78.3%, MMLU-Pro: 74.0%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

Is IBM Granite 4.2 8B cheaper than MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

IBM Granite 4.2 8B is 2.3x cheaper for input tokens. IBM Granite 4.2 8B costs $0.06/M input and $0.25/M output via deepinfra. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for IBM Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

IBM Granite 4.2 8B supports 131K tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between IBM Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (19.3 vs 44.8), context window (131K vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.06 vs $0.14/M), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes IBM Granite 4.2 8B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

IBM Granite 4.2 8B is developed by IBM and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons