The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched at 44.8 and 48.7 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.5x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.8 and 48.7.

In the 5 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiniMax M3.1 Flash wins 4; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 1.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 1.5x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose MiniMax M3.1 Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 4 of 5 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.8
#45
48.7
#29
Reasoning
43.6
#50
45.9
#32
Coding
34.0
#37
37.9
#23
Agents
32.0
#38
35.7
#22
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 5
4 of 5
Input price
$0.14 / M
$0.15 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$0.60 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Tool use
26.4#33
27.1#27
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 15 for MiniMax M3.1 Flash

5 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (CyberGym), while MiniMax M3.1 Flash is better at 4 benchmarks (Agents' Last Exam, AutomationBench v1.0.6, DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 4.0).

MiniMax M3.1 Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.1x cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.15/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash ($0.60/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiniMax M3.1 Flash is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input tokens$0.15
Output tokens$0.60
Best providerMiniMax
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M3.1 Flash's 1,000,000 tokens. Only MiniMax M3.1 Flash specifies output context (524,288 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Input1,000,000 tokens
Output524,288 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M3.1 Flash was released on 2026-10-19.

MiniMax M3.1 Flash is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

3 weeks ago

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

Oct 19, 2026

0 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. MiniMax M3.1 Flash is available from MiniMax.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

MiniMax M3.1 Flash

minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.15/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.60/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M3.1 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.8 and 48.7. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to MiniMax M3.1 Flash in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. MiniMax M3.1 Flash scores BabyVision: 91.0%, CharXiv-R: 82.5%, CyberGym: 82.2%, BankerToolBench: 76.2%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.7%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper than MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 1.1x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi. MiniMax M3.1 Flash costs $0.15/M input and $0.60/M output via minimax.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M3.1 Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.8 vs 48.7), context window (1.0M vs 1.0M), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.15/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M3.1 Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M3.1 Flash is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons