The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 21.8.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 21.8, ranking #45 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.8 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.8
#45
21.8
#203
Reasoning
43.6
#50
19.6
#216
Coding
34.0
#37
2.8
#244
Agents
32.0
#38
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
26.4#33
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

305.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 305.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 7625.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

1 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

6 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 21.8. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.8 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons