The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched at 3.6 and 4.7 on the LLM Stats Score.

Nous Research · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 3.6 and 4.7.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Hermes 3 70B wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Hermes 3 70B

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Mar 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
3.6
#330
4.7
#324
0.8
#339
0.9
#338
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.70 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.70 / M
— / M
Context window
131,072
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Hermes 3 70B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
-1.1#314
5.0#286
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

17 reported for Hermes 3 70B · 45 for Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

3 shared

Hermes 3 70B outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, MMLU-Pro), while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is better at 1 benchmark (MATH).

Hermes 3 70B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

63.0B diff

Hermes 3 70B has 63.0B more parameters than Qwen2.5-Omni-7B, making it 900.0% larger.

Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
70.0Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
7.0Bparameters
70.0B
Hermes 3 70B
7.0B
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Hermes 3 70B specifies input context (131,072 tokens). Only Hermes 3 70B specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Nous Research
Hermes 3 70B
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports multimodal inputs, whereas Hermes 3 70B does not.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Hermes 3 70B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under Apache 2.0.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

Hermes 3 70B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Hermes 3 70B was released on 2024-08-15, while Qwen2.5-Omni-7B was released on 2025-03-27.

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is 7 months newer than Hermes 3 70B.

Hermes 3 70B

Aug 15, 2024

2.2 years ago

Qwen2.5-Omni-7B

Mar 27, 2025

1.6 years ago

7mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Hermes 3 70B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5-Omni-7B
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Hermes 3 70B vs Qwen2.5-Omni-7B.

Which is better, Hermes 3 70B or Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 3.6 and 4.7. Hermes 3 70B is made by Nous Research and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Hermes 3 70B compare to Qwen2.5-Omni-7B in benchmarks?

Hermes 3 70B scores MT-Bench: 89.9%, HellaSwag: 88.2%, BoolQ: 88.0%, PIQA: 84.4%, Winogrande: 83.2%. Qwen2.5-Omni-7B scores FLEURS: 95.9%, DocVQA: 95.2%, VocalSound: 93.9%, GSM8k: 88.7%, GiantSteps Tempo: 88.0%.

What are the context window sizes for Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Hermes 3 70B supports 131K tokens and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (3.6 vs 4.7), multimodal support (no vs yes). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Hermes 3 70B and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B?

Hermes 3 70B is developed by Nous Research and Qwen2.5-Omni-7B is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.