The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 35.4. Ling 3.0 Flash is 44.4x cheaper per token.

Moonshot AI · InclusionAI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 35.4, ranking #5 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, Ling 3.0 Flash is roughly 44.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Kimi K3.1 Pro also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Ling 3.0 Flash

  • cost matters — it's about 44.4x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Kimi K3.1 Pro
Moonshot AI
Ling 3.0 Flash
InclusionAI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
55.5
#5
35.4
#107
Reasoning
54.3
#6
34.6
#107
Coding
42.7
#9
24.4
#94
Agents
41.6
#5
19.0
#93
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$2.00 / M
$0.06 / M
Output price
$10.00 / M
$0.18 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,072

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Ling 3.0 Flash
Math
38.6#26
29.6#91
Tool use
30.4#14
16.5#102
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 19 for Ling 3.0 Flash

1 shared

Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (BrowseComp), while Ling 3.0 Flash is better at 0 benchmarks.

Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Ling 3.0 Flash costs less

For input processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 33.3x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash ($0.06/1M tokens).

For output processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 55.6x more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash ($0.18/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than Ling 3.0 Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com
Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input tokens$2.00
Output tokens$10.00
Best providerUnknown Organization
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input tokens$0.06
Output tokens$0.18
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Kimi K3.1 Pro accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Ling 3.0 Flash's 131,072 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while Ling 3.0 Flash is limited to 131,072 tokens.

Moonshot AI
Kimi K3.1 Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output1,048,576 tokens
InclusionAI
Ling 3.0 Flash
Input131,072 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Oct 30 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Kimi K3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Ling 3.0 Flash does not.

Kimi K3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Ling 3.0 Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while Ling 3.0 Flash was released on 2026-08-04.

Kimi K3.1 Pro is 3 months newer than Ling 3.0 Flash.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

Oct 23, 2026

6 days ago

2mo newer
Ling 3.0 Flash

Aug 4, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI. Ling 3.0 Flash is available from DeepInfra.

Kimi K3.1 Pro

moonshot logo
Unknown Organization
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $10.00/1M

Ling 3.0 Flash

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.06/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.18/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Kimi K3.1 Pro
✓ Preferred
Ling 3.0 Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs Ling 3.0 Flash.

Which is better, Kimi K3.1 Pro or Ling 3.0 Flash?

Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 35.4. Kimi K3.1 Pro is made by Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Flash is made by InclusionAI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Kimi K3.1 Pro compare to Ling 3.0 Flash in benchmarks?

Kimi K3.1 Pro scores BabyVision: 95.4%, GPQA: 94.2%, BenchCAD (with Python tool): 92.7%, BrowseComp: 92.1%, Chartography: 90.2%. Ling 3.0 Flash scores AIME 2026: 93.2%, Multi-IF: 87.7%, HMMT Feb 26: 87.0%, IMO-AnswerBench: 83.7%, LiveCodeBench v6: 82.8%.

Is Kimi K3.1 Pro cheaper than Ling 3.0 Flash?

Ling 3.0 Flash is 33.3x cheaper for input tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro costs $2.00/M input and $10.00/M output via moonshot. Ling 3.0 Flash costs $0.06/M input and $0.18/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for Kimi K3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Kimi K3.1 Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Ling 3.0 Flash supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Kimi K3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (55.5 vs 35.4), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($2.00 vs $0.06/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Kimi K3.1 Pro and Ling 3.0 Flash?

Kimi K3.1 Pro is developed by Moonshot AI and Ling 3.0 Flash is developed by InclusionAI.

Related comparisons