Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 25.1. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is 7.4x cheaper per token.
Moonshot AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Kimi K3.1 Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 55.5 to 25.1, ranking #5 overall.
In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Kimi K3.1 Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is roughly 7.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Kimi K3.1 Pro
- overall performance matters — it scores 55.5 and ranks #5 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro
- cost matters — it's about 7.4x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
30 reported for Kimi K3.1 Pro · 31 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Kimi K3.1 Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (GPQA, Humanity's Last Exam), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.
Kimi K3.1 Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($2.00/1M tokens) is 4.6x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).
For output processing, Kimi K3.1 Pro ($10.00/1M tokens) is 11.5x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Kimi K3.1 Pro is more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Kimi K3.1 Pro can generate longer responses up to 1,048,576 tokens, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is limited to 131,072 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Kimi K3.1 Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.
Kimi K3.1 Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Kimi K3.1 Pro was released on 2026-10-23, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.
Kimi K3.1 Pro is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.
Oct 23, 2026
6 days ago
5mo newerApr 27, 2026
6 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Kimi K3.1 Pro is available from Moonshot AI. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.
Kimi K3.1 Pro
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Kimi K3.1 Pro and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Kimi K3.1 Pro vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.