The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

LFM3-1.7B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 6.7.

Liquid AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-1.7B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 6.7, ranking #191 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-1.7B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 25.0 and ranks #191 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM3-1.7B
Liquid AI
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.0
#191
6.7
#329
Reasoning
20.8
#216
2.6
#341
Agents
18.1
#97
-3.3
#218
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
LFM3-1.7B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Math
7.6#285
2.3#316
Long context
5.1#112
0.9#125
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

20 reported for LFM3-1.7B · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

No common benchmarks found

LFM3-1.7B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instructdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.6B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has 6.6B more parameters than LFM3-1.7B, making it 379.2% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-1.7B
1.7Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
1.7B
LFM3-1.7B
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas LFM3-1.7B does not.

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LFM3-1.7B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-1.7B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-1.7B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-1.7B was released on 2026-10-27, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

LFM3-1.7B is 21 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

LFM3-1.7B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-1.7B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-1.7B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-1.7B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, LFM3-1.7B or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

LFM3-1.7B leads the LLM Stats Score 25.0 to 6.7. LFM3-1.7B is made by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-1.7B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

LFM3-1.7B scores IFEval: 96.7%, Multi-IF: 89.1%, LiveCodeBench v6: 73.5%, IFBench: 73.0%, BFCL-V4: 71.4%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the main differences between LFM3-1.7B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.0 vs 6.7), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-1.7B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

LFM3-1.7B is developed by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons