The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 6.7.

Liquid AI · Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the overall LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 6.7, ranking #265 overall.

In the 15 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LFM3-VL-2B wins 10; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • overall performance matters — it scores 15.5 and ranks #265 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 10 of 15 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

  • you are already invested in the Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team ecosystem

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.5
#265
6.7
#329
Reasoning
16.2
#252
2.6
#341
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
10 of 15
5 of 15
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window
—
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

3 shared
Index
LFM3-VL-2B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Math
19.0#187
2.3#315
Vision
11.4#133
4.7#186
Multimodal
12.6#124
6.6#154
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 32 for Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

15 shared

LFM3-VL-2B outperforms in 10 benchmarks (ChartQA, DocVQA, Hallusion Bench, InfoVQA, MathVision, MathVista-Mini, MMMU-Pro, MMStar, ScreenSpot Pro, TextVQA), while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is better at 5 benchmarks (LVBench, MVBench, OCRBench, VideoMME w/o sub., VideoMME w sub.).

LFM3-VL-2B shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Sat Nov 07 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

6.4B diff

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct has 6.4B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 331.8% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
8.3Bparameters
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B
8.3B
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct was released on 2025-01-26.

LFM3-VL-2B is 21 months newer than Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1.8yr newer
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct

Jan 26, 2025

1.8 years ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

LFM3-VL-2B leads the LLM Stats Score 15.5 to 6.7. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is made by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct scores DocVQA: 95.7%, Android Control Low_EM: 91.4%, MobileMiniWob++_SR: 91.4%, ChartQA: 87.3%, OCRBench: 86.4%.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 6.7), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and Qwen2.5 VL 7B Instruct is developed by Alibaba Cloud / Qwen Team.

Related comparisons