The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 15.5.

Liquid AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 15.5, ranking #48 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LFM3-VL-2B

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.7 and ranks #48 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LFM3-VL-2B
Liquid AI
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
15.5
#265
44.7
#48
Reasoning
16.2
#252
43.0
#54
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
— / M
$0.14 / M
Output price
— / M
$0.28 / M
Context window
—
1,048,576

Individual benchmarks

41 reported for LFM3-VL-2B · 16 for MiMo-V2.6-Flash

No common benchmarks found

LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flashdon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

307.1B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 307.1B more parameters than LFM3-VL-2B, making it 15993.8% larger.

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
1.9Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
1.9B
LFM3-VL-2B
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Liquid AI
LFM3-VL-2B
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

LFM3-VL-2B

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

LFM3-VL-2B is licensed under LFM Open License v1.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

LFM3-VL-2B

LFM Open License v1.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LFM3-VL-2B was released on 2026-10-27, while MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22.

LFM3-VL-2B is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

LFM3-VL-2B

Oct 27, 2026

1 weeks ago

1mo newer
MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LFM3-VL-2B
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LFM3-VL-2B vs MiMo-V2.6-Flash.

Which is better, LFM3-VL-2B or MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 15.5. LFM3-VL-2B is made by Liquid AI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LFM3-VL-2B compare to MiMo-V2.6-Flash in benchmarks?

LFM3-VL-2B scores DocVQA: 96.7%, CountBench: 93.0%, ChartQA: 92.7%, RefCOCO-avg: 90.5%, POPE: 88.7%. MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%.

What are the context window sizes for LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

LFM3-VL-2B supports an unknown number of tokens and MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (15.5 vs 44.7), licensing (LFM Open License v1.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LFM3-VL-2B and MiMo-V2.6-Flash?

LFM3-VL-2B is developed by Liquid AI and MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons