MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Particle-1
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 32.0. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.5x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Particle AI · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.7 to 32.0, ranking #48 overall.
On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 2.5x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash
- overall performance matters — it scores 44.7 and ranks #48 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- cost matters — it's about 2.5x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Particle-1
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 3 for Particle-1
MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Particle-1don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.8x cheaper than Particle-1 ($0.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 3.6x cheaper than Particle-1 ($1.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Particle-1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Particle-1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Particle-1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Particle-1
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Particle-1 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Particle-1 was released on 2026-10-28.
Particle-1 is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.
Sep 22, 2026
1 months ago
Oct 28, 2026
1 weeks ago
1mo newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Particle-1 is available from Particle AI.
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Particle-1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Particle-1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Particle-1.