Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Mercury 3
Mercury 3 leads the LLM Stats Score 36.1 to -1.8. Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is 3.3x cheaper per token.
Meta · Inception · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Mercury 3 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 36.1 to -1.8, ranking #98 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Mercury 3 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is roughly 3.3x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Mercury 3 also accepts a larger context window (1,000,000 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 3.3x cheaper per token
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Mercury 3
- overall performance matters — it scores 36.1 and ranks #98 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 1,000,000 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Individual benchmarks
11 reported for Llama 3.2 11B Instruct · 12 for Mercury 3
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Mercury 3 is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Mercury 3 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 2.0x cheaper than Mercury 3 ($0.10/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.2 11B Instruct ($0.05/1M tokens) is 7.0x cheaper than Mercury 3 ($0.35/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Mercury 3 is more expensive than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Mercury 3 accepts 1,000,000 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Mercury 3 can generate longer responses up to 131,072 tokens, while Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct supports multimodal inputs, whereas Mercury 3 does not.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Mercury 3
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2 Community License, while Mercury 3 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2 Community License
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Mercury 3 was released on 2026-10-19.
Mercury 3 is 25 months newer than Llama 3.2 11B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.1 years ago
Oct 19, 2026
0 days ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2023-12-31, while Mercury 3's cutoff date is not specified.
We can confirm Llama 3.2 11B Instruct's training data extends to 2023-12-31, but cannot make a direct comparison without Mercury 3's cutoff date.
Dec 2023
—
Provider Availability
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Sambanova, Bedrock, Groq, Together, Fireworks. Mercury 3 is available from Inception.
Llama 3.2 11B Instruct
Mercury 3
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 11B Instruct and Mercury 3 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 11B Instruct vs Mercury 3.