Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 4.9. Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is 1.1x cheaper per token.
Meta · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 35.0 to 4.9, ranking #108 overall.
In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is roughly 1.1x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) also accepts a larger context window (262,144 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
- cost matters — it's about 1.1x cheaper per token
Choose Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
- overall performance matters — it scores 35.0 and ranks #108 on LLM Stats
- your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
- you process long inputs — it offers a 262,144 token context window
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
13 reported for Llama 3.2 90B Instruct · 19 for Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.35/1M tokens) is 1.7x more expensive than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($0.20/1M tokens).
For output processing, Llama 3.2 90B Instruct ($0.40/1M tokens) is 2.5x cheaper than Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) ($1.00/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is more expensive than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Model Size
Parameter count comparison
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) has 30.0B more parameters than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct, making it 33.3% larger.
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) accepts 262,144 input tokens compared to Llama 3.2 90B Instruct's 128,000 tokens. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) can generate longer responses up to 262,144 tokens, while Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is limited to 128,000 tokens.
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
License
Usage and distribution terms
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is licensed under Llama 3.2, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
Llama 3.2
Open weights
OpenMDW License v1.1
Open weights
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct was released on 2024-09-25, while Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) was released on 2026-10-15.
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is 25 months newer than Llama 3.2 90B Instruct.
Sep 25, 2024
2.1 years ago
Oct 15, 2026
4 days ago
2.1yr newerKnowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct is available from DeepInfra, Bedrock, Fireworks, Together, Hyperbolic. Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) is available from DeepInfra.
Llama 3.2 90B Instruct
Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B)
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against Llama 3.2 90B Instruct and Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about Llama 3.2 90B Instruct vs Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B).
Related comparisons
More Llama 3.2 90B Instruct comparisons
More Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) comparisons
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs MiniMax M3.1 Flash
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs DeepSeek-V4.1-Flash-1017
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Spark Open
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
- Nemotron 3.5 Super VL (120B A12B) vs Muse Wonder