The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Llama 4 Scout vs Magistral Medium

Magistral Medium leads the LLM Stats Score 13.3 to 8.0.

Meta · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Magistral Medium leads the overall LLM Stats Score 13.3 to 8.0, ranking #235 overall.

In the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models, Magistral Medium wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Llama 4 Scout

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.08/M input and $0.30/M output

Choose Magistral Medium

  • overall performance matters — it scores 13.3 and ranks #235 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 2 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Jun 2025

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
8.0
#272
13.3
#235
6.7
#274
13.5
#226
0.5
#231
3.7
#208
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
0 of 2
2 of 2
Input price
$0.08 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.30 / M
— / M
Context window
10,000,000

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
Llama 4 Scout
Magistral Medium
13.1#223
11.7#235
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

12 reported for Llama 4 Scout · 6 for Magistral Medium

2 shared

Llama 4 Scout outperforms in 0 benchmarks, while Magistral Medium is better at 2 benchmarks (GPQA, LiveCodeBench).

Magistral Medium significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

85.0B diff

Llama 4 Scout has 85.0B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 354.2% larger.

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
109.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
109.0B
Llama 4 Scout
24.0B
Magistral Medium

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only Llama 4 Scout specifies input context (10,000,000 tokens). Only Llama 4 Scout specifies output context (10,000,000 tokens).

Meta
Llama 4 Scout
Input10,000,000 tokens
Output10,000,000 tokens
Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Sun Sep 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Llama 4 Scout and Magistral Medium support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Llama 4 Scout

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Llama 4 Scout is licensed under Llama 4 Community License Agreement, while Magistral Medium uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Llama 4 Scout

Llama 4 Community License Agreement

Open weights

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Llama 4 Scout was released on 2025-04-05, while Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10.

Magistral Medium is 2 months newer than Llama 4 Scout.

Llama 4 Scout

Apr 5, 2025

1.4 years ago

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.2 years ago

2mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without Llama 4 Scout's cutoff date.

Llama 4 Scout

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Llama 4 Scout and Magistral Medium side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Llama 4 Scout
✓ Preferred
Magistral Medium
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Llama 4 Scout vs Magistral Medium.

Which is better, Llama 4 Scout or Magistral Medium?

Magistral Medium leads the LLM Stats Score 13.3 to 8.0. Llama 4 Scout is made by Meta and Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Llama 4 Scout compare to Magistral Medium in benchmarks?

Llama 4 Scout scores DocVQA: 94.4%, MGSM: 90.6%, ChartQA: 88.8%, MMLU: 79.6%, MMLU-Pro: 74.3%. Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%.

What are the context window sizes for Llama 4 Scout and Magistral Medium?

Llama 4 Scout supports 10.0M tokens and Magistral Medium supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between Llama 4 Scout and Magistral Medium?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (8.0 vs 13.3), licensing (Llama 4 Community License Agreement vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Llama 4 Scout and Magistral Medium?

Llama 4 Scout is developed by Meta and Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI.