The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 13.1.

Mistral AI · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 13.1, ranking #57 overall.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose Magistral Medium

  • you are already invested in the Mistral AI ecosystem

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 40.6 and ranks #57 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
13.1
#250
40.6
#57
3.5
#219
34.1
#35
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
Input price
— / M
— / M
Output price
— / M
— / M
Context window

Individual benchmarks

6 reported for Magistral Medium · 3 for MiMo-V2.6-Pro

No common benchmarks found

Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Prodon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

996.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 996.0B more parameters than Magistral Medium, making it 4150.0% larger.

Mistral AI
Magistral Medium
24.0Bparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
24.0B
Magistral Medium
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

Magistral Medium

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Magistral Medium is licensed under Apache 2.0, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro uses MIT.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

Magistral Medium

Apache 2.0

Open weights

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

Magistral Medium was released on 2025-06-10, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 16 months newer than Magistral Medium.

Magistral Medium

Jun 10, 2025

1.3 years ago

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

1.3yr newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Magistral Medium has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2025-06-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Magistral Medium's training data extends to 2025-06-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

Magistral Medium

Jun 2025

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

Magistral Medium
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about Magistral Medium vs MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

Which is better, Magistral Medium or MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 40.6 to 13.1. Magistral Medium is made by Mistral AI and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does Magistral Medium compare to MiMo-V2.6-Pro in benchmarks?

Magistral Medium scores AIME 2024: 73.6%, GPQA: 70.8%, AIME 2025: 64.9%, LiveCodeBench: 50.3%, Aider-Polyglot: 47.1%. MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores DeepSWE 1.1: 71.9%, MiMo Coding Bench: 63.2%, Program Bench: 26.5%.

What are the main differences between Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (13.1 vs 40.6), licensing (Apache 2.0 vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes Magistral Medium and MiMo-V2.6-Pro?

Magistral Medium is developed by Mistral AI and MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.