The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 25.1. LongCat-2.5 is 1.0x cheaper per token.

Meituan · Xiaomi · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

LongCat-2.5 leads the overall LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 25.1, ranking #20 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, LongCat-2.5 wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose LongCat-2.5

  • overall performance matters — it scores 50.0 and ranks #20 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Nov 2026

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

LongCat-2.5
Meituan
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
50.0
#20
25.1
#189
Reasoning
48.3
#21
23.5
#196
Coding
38.6
#27
31.7
#59
Agents
36.3
#23
23.4
#81
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.30 / M
$0.43 / M
Output price
$1.20 / M
$0.87 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
LongCat-2.5
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Math
37.2#37
25.4#118
Tool use
30.2#15
23.3#52
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

23 reported for LongCat-2.5 · 31 for MiMo-V2.5-Pro

1 shared

LongCat-2.5 outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Claw-Eval), while MiMo-V2.5-Pro is better at 0 benchmarks.

LongCat-2.5 significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

LongCat-2.5 costs less

For input processing, LongCat-2.5 ($0.30/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens).

For output processing, LongCat-2.5 ($1.20/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than MiMo-V2.5-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.5-Pro is more expensive than LongCat-2.5.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com
Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerMeituan
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input tokens$0.43
Output tokens$0.87
Best providerXiaomi
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

576.8B diff

LongCat-2.5 has 576.8B more parameters than MiMo-V2.5-Pro, making it 56.4% larger.

Meituan
LongCat-2.5
1.6Tparameters
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
1.0Tparameters
1600.0B
LongCat-2.5
1023.2B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Both models can generate responses up to 131,072 tokens.

Meituan
LongCat-2.5
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

LongCat-2.5 supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

LongCat-2.5 can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

LongCat-2.5

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

LongCat-2.5 was released on 2026-11-01, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27.

LongCat-2.5 is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

LongCat-2.5

Nov 1, 2026

4 days ago

6mo newer
MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

6 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

LongCat-2.5 is available from Meituan. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is available from Xiaomi, DeepInfra, Novita.

LongCat-2.5

meituan logo
Meituan
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.43/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.87/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $1.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $3.00/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $2.00/1MOutput Price:Output: $6.00/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against LongCat-2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

LongCat-2.5
✓ Preferred
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about LongCat-2.5 vs MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

Which is better, LongCat-2.5 or MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

LongCat-2.5 leads the LLM Stats Score 50.0 to 25.1. LongCat-2.5 is made by Meituan and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does LongCat-2.5 compare to MiMo-V2.5-Pro in benchmarks?

LongCat-2.5 scores MathVision: 96.5%, BrowseComp: 91.9%, CharXiv-R: 90.2%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 88.4%, Video-MME: 85.2%. MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%.

Is LongCat-2.5 cheaper than MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

LongCat-2.5 is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. LongCat-2.5 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via meituan. MiMo-V2.5-Pro costs $0.43/M input and $0.87/M output via xiaomi.

What are the context window sizes for LongCat-2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

LongCat-2.5 supports 1.0M tokens and MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between LongCat-2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (50.0 vs 25.1), input pricing ($0.30 vs $0.43/M), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (Unknown vs MIT). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes LongCat-2.5 and MiMo-V2.5-Pro?

LongCat-2.5 is developed by Meituan and MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi.

Related comparisons