The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 25.4.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the overall LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 25.4, ranking #142 overall.

The models split the 2 individual benchmarks reported for both models evenly.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • overall performance matters — it scores 29.9 and ranks #142 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning — it leads those capability indexes
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.4
#178
29.9
#142
Reasoning
23.9
#183
29.2
#143
Coding
32.4
#46
14.8
#151
Agents
23.8
#69
12.4
#124
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 2
1 of 2
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Math
25.4#116
23.6#135
Tool use
23.1#46
5.6#168
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for MiMo-V2.5-Pro · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

2 shared

MiMo-V2.5-Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

Both models are evenly matched across the benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

949.2B diff

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 949.2B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 1282.8% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
1023.2B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiMo-V2.5-Pro does not.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

5 months ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.5-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) leads the LLM Stats Score 29.9 to 25.4. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.4 vs 29.9), multimodal support (no vs yes), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons