The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched at 25.4 and 22.1 on the LLM Stats Score.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 25.4 and 22.1.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.5-Pro wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.5-Pro

  • your work emphasizes coding and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Xiaomi
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
25.4
#178
22.1
#202
Reasoning
23.9
#183
19.8
#213
Coding
32.4
#46
2.9
#241
Agents
23.8
#69
-0.7
#198
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

2 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Math
25.4#116
12.2#245
Tool use
23.1#46
-2.1#205
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

31 reported for MiMo-V2.5-Pro · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

3 shared

MiMo-V2.5-Pro outperforms in 2 benchmarks (Humanity's Last Exam, SWE-Bench Verified), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 1 benchmark (GPQA).

MiMo-V2.5-Pro shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1019.2B diff

MiMo-V2.5-Pro has 1019.2B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 25481.1% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
1023.2B
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens). Only MiMo-V2.5-Pro specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.5-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Mon Oct 19 2026 • llm-stats.com

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.5-Pro was released on 2026-04-27, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 6 months newer than MiMo-V2.5-Pro.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro

Apr 27, 2026

5 months ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

5mo newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.5-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.5-Pro vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.5-Pro or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 25.4 and 22.1. MiMo-V2.5-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.5-Pro compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro scores FrontierSWE (Impl.): 100.0%, GSM8k: 99.6%, ARC-C: 97.2%, MMLU-Redux: 92.8%, C-Eval: 91.5%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (25.4 vs 22.1), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.5-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.5-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons