The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M2.7

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 35.4. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3.0x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · MiniMax · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 35.4, ranking #45 overall.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 3.0x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.8 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • cost matters — it's about 3.0x cheaper per token
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose MiniMax M2.7

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
MiniMax M2.7
MiniMax
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.8
#45
35.4
#105
Reasoning
43.6
#50
34.5
#106
Coding
34.0
#37
27.1
#77
Agents
32.0
#38
15.6
#105
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.14 / M
$0.30 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$1.20 / M
Context window
1,048,576
196,608

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
MiniMax M2.7
Tool use
26.4#33
15.2#108
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 11 for MiniMax M2.7

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M2.7don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 2.1x cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 ($0.30/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 4.3x cheaper than MiniMax M2.7 ($1.20/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiniMax M2.7 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.7
Input tokens$0.30
Output tokens$1.20
Best providerFireworks
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to MiniMax M2.7's 196,608 tokens. Only MiniMax M2.7 specifies output context (196,608 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
MiniMax
MiniMax M2.7
Input196,608 tokens
Output196,608 tokens
Thu Oct 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas MiniMax M2.7 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

MiniMax M2.7

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

Both models are licensed under MIT.

Both models share the same licensing terms, providing consistent usage rights.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

MiniMax M2.7

MIT

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while MiniMax M2.7 was released on 2026-03-18.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 6 months newer than MiniMax M2.7.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

3 weeks ago

6mo newer
MiniMax M2.7

Mar 18, 2026

7 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. MiniMax M2.7 is available from Fireworks, MiniMax, Novita, DeepInfra.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

MiniMax M2.7

fireworks logo
Fireworks
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
minimax logo
MiniMax
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
novita logo
Novita
Input Price:Input: $0.30/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.20/1M
deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.38/1MOutput Price:Output: $1.70/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M2.7 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
MiniMax M2.7
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs MiniMax M2.7.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or MiniMax M2.7?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 35.4. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and MiniMax M2.7 is made by MiniMax. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to MiniMax M2.7 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. MiniMax M2.7 scores SWE-bench Multilingual: 76.5%, MLE-Bench Lite: 66.6%, MM-ClawBench: 62.7%, Terminal-Bench 2.0: 57.0%, SWE-Bench Pro: 56.2%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper than MiniMax M2.7?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 2.1x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi. MiniMax M2.7 costs $0.30/M input and $1.20/M output via fireworks.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M2.7?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and MiniMax M2.7 supports 197K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M2.7?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.8 vs 35.4), context window (1.0M vs 197K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.30/M), multimodal support (yes vs no). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and MiniMax M2.7?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and MiniMax M2.7 is developed by MiniMax.

Related comparisons