The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 11.2. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 1.8x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · Mistral AI · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 11.2, ranking #29 overall.

On price, Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is roughly 1.8x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 45.6 and ranks #29 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026

Choose Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

  • cost matters — it's about 1.8x cheaper per token

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Mistral AI
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.6
#29
11.2
#262
Reasoning
42.5
#45
11.4
#257
Coding
36.7
#21
6.8
#191
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.14 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$0.10 / M
Context window
1,048,576
131,100

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 4 for Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)don't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 2.8x more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) ($0.10/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is more expensive than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.10
Best providerMistral
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

306.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Flash has 306.0B more parameters than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512), making it 10200.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
309.0Bparameters
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
3.0Bparameters
309.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
3.0B
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)'s 131,100 tokens. Only Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) specifies output context (131,100 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Mistral AI
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Input131,100 tokens
Output131,100 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) uses Apache 2.0.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Apache 2.0

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) was released on 2025-12-04.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 10 months newer than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

0 days ago

9mo newer
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

Dec 4, 2025

9 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is available from Mistral AI.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)

mistral logo
Mistral
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.10/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 45.6 to 11.2. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is made by Mistral AI. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) scores AIME 2024: 77.5%, AIME 2025: 72.1%, LiveCodeBench: 54.8%, GPQA: 53.4%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper than Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi. Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) costs $0.10/M input and $0.10/M output via mistral.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) supports 131K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.6 vs 11.2), context window (1.0M vs 131K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.10/M), licensing (MIT vs Apache 2.0). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512)?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Min istral 3 (3B Reasoning 2512) is developed by Mistral AI.

Related comparisons