The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched at 45.6 and 49.5 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 11.4x cheaper per token.

Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 45.6 and 49.5.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Flash wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

On price, MiMo-V2.6-Flash is roughly 11.4x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results
  • cost matters — it's about 11.4x cheaper per token
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Muse Spark 1.1

  • you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Muse Spark 1.1
Meta
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
45.6
#29
49.5
#20
Reasoning
42.5
#45
49.9
#14
Coding
36.7
#21
34.5
#34
Agents
33.1
#26
34.4
#25
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
2 of 3
1 of 3
Input price
$0.14 / M
$1.25 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$4.25 / M
Context window
1,048,576
1,048,576

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Muse Spark 1.1
Tool use
24.7#29
29.2#10
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 11 for Muse Spark 1.1

3 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs less

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 8.9x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 15.2x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).

In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Flash.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input tokens$1.25
Output tokens$4.25
Best providerMeta
Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue→

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Meta
Muse Spark 1.1
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output131,072 tokens
Tue Sep 22 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Muse Spark 1.1

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Muse Spark 1.1

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 3 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

-1 days ago

2mo newer
Muse Spark 1.1

Jul 9, 2026

2 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

Muse Spark 1.1

meta logo
Meta
Input Price:Input: $1.25/1MOutput Price:Output: $4.25/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?Start an Issue discussion→

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Muse Spark 1.1
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Muse Spark 1.1.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Muse Spark 1.1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 45.6 and 49.5. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Muse Spark 1.1 is made by Meta. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Muse Spark 1.1 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Muse Spark 1.1 scores CharXiv-R: 88.4%, MCP Atlas: 88.1%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 80.0%, BabyVision: 76.3%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 8.9x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi. Muse Spark 1.1 costs $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output via meta.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Muse Spark 1.1 supports 1.0M tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (45.6 vs 49.5), input pricing ($0.14 vs $1.25/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Muse Spark 1.1?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Muse Spark 1.1 is developed by Meta.

Related comparisons