MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched at 49.8 and 49.5 on the LLM Stats Score. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3.7x cheaper per token.
Xiaomi · Meta · Updated for 2026
Which is better?
MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 49.8 and 49.5.
In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 3; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.
On price, MiMo-V2.6-Pro is roughly 3.7x cheaper per token on a blended 3:1 input/output basis, which adds up quickly at production volume.
Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.
Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro
- you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 3 of 3 exact shared results
- cost matters — it's about 3.7x cheaper per token
- you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
- you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune
Choose Muse Spark 1.1
- you want predictable pricing at $1.25/M input and $4.25/M output
At a glance
The differences that matter most.
Capability indexes
Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks
Individual benchmarks
18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 11 for Muse Spark 1.1
MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 3 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, OSWorld-Verified, Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Muse Spark 1.1 is better at 0 benchmarks.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.
Human preference
Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores
Pricing Analysis
Price comparison per million tokens
For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.43/1M tokens) is 2.9x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($1.25/1M tokens).
For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Pro ($0.87/1M tokens) is 4.9x cheaper than Muse Spark 1.1 ($4.25/1M tokens).
In conclusion, Muse Spark 1.1 is more expensive than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.*
* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens
Context Window
Maximum input and output token capacity
Both models have the same input context window of 1,048,576 tokens. Only Muse Spark 1.1 specifies output context (131,072 tokens).
Input capabilities
Documented input modalities across available providers
Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 support multimodal inputs.
They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Muse Spark 1.1
License
Usage and distribution terms
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Muse Spark 1.1 uses a proprietary license.
License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.
MIT
Open weights
Proprietary
Closed source
Release Timeline
When each model was launched
MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Muse Spark 1.1 was released on 2026-07-09.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is 3 months newer than Muse Spark 1.1.
Sep 22, 2026
-1 days ago
2mo newerJul 9, 2026
2 months ago
Knowledge Cutoff
When training data ends
Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.
Unable to compare the recency of their training data.
Provider Availability
MiMo-V2.6-Pro is available from Xiaomi. Muse Spark 1.1 is available from Meta Model API.
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Muse Spark 1.1
Outputs Comparison
Judge for yourself.
Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Muse Spark 1.1 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.
FAQ
Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Muse Spark 1.1.