The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.0 Mini

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 27.8. MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini cost the same.

Xiaomi · ByteDance · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the overall LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 27.8, ranking #45 overall.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash also accepts a larger context window (1,048,576 input tokens), making it the stronger choice for long documents and large codebases.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • overall performance matters — it scores 44.8 and ranks #45 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and agents — it leads those capability indexes
  • you process long inputs — it offers a 1,048,576 token context window
  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose Seed 2.0 Mini

  • you want predictable pricing at $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Xiaomi
Seed 2.0 Mini
ByteDance
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
44.8
#45
27.8
#159
Reasoning
43.6
#50
28.7
#148
Coding
34.0
#37
1.5
#254
Agents
32.0
#38
1.1
#195
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
—
—
Input price
$0.14 / M
$0.10 / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
$0.40 / M
Context window
1,048,576
256,000

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 83 for Seed 2.0 Mini

No common benchmarks found

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Minidon't have any common benchmark datasets to compare. They may have been evaluated on different testing suites.

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Pricing Analysis

Price comparison per million tokens

For input processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.14/1M tokens) is 1.4x more expensive than Seed 2.0 Mini ($0.10/1M tokens).

For output processing, MiMo-V2.6-Flash ($0.28/1M tokens) is 1.4x cheaper than Seed 2.0 Mini ($0.40/1M tokens).

In conclusion, MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini cost the same.*

* Using a 3:1 ratio of input to output tokens

Lowest available price from all providers
Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com
Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input tokens$0.14
Output tokens$0.28
Best providerXiaomi
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Mini
Input tokens$0.10
Output tokens$0.40
Best providerDeepinfra
Notice missing or incorrect data?

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

MiMo-V2.6-Flash accepts 1,048,576 input tokens compared to Seed 2.0 Mini's 256,000 tokens. Only Seed 2.0 Mini specifies output context (256,000 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
ByteDance
Seed 2.0 Mini
Input256,000 tokens
Output256,000 tokens
Sat Oct 24 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Seed 2.0 Mini

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while Seed 2.0 Mini uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

Seed 2.0 Mini

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while Seed 2.0 Mini was released on 2026-02-17.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 7 months newer than Seed 2.0 Mini.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

4 weeks ago

7mo newer
Seed 2.0 Mini

Feb 17, 2026

8 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Provider Availability

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is available from Xiaomi. Seed 2.0 Mini is available from DeepInfra.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

xiaomi logo
Xiaomi
Input Price:Input: $0.14/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.28/1M

Seed 2.0 Mini

deepinfra logo
Deepinfra
Input Price:Input: $0.10/1MOutput Price:Output: $0.40/1M
* Prices shown are per million tokens

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
Seed 2.0 Mini
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs Seed 2.0 Mini.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or Seed 2.0 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash leads the LLM Stats Score 44.8 to 27.8. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and Seed 2.0 Mini is made by ByteDance. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to Seed 2.0 Mini in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. Seed 2.0 Mini scores CountBench: 95.5%, VLMsAreBlind: 93.1%, Graphwalks parents <128k: 93.0%, CharXiv-D: 91.9%, LongFact Concepts: 91.4%.

Is MiMo-V2.6-Flash cheaper than Seed 2.0 Mini?

Seed 2.0 Mini is 1.4x cheaper for input tokens. MiMo-V2.6-Flash costs $0.14/M input and $0.28/M output via xiaomi. Seed 2.0 Mini costs $0.10/M input and $0.40/M output via deepinfra.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and Seed 2.0 Mini supports 256K tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.8 vs 27.8), context window (1.0M vs 256K), input pricing ($0.14 vs $0.10/M), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and Seed 2.0 Mini?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and Seed 2.0 Mini is developed by ByteDance.

Related comparisons