The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs SWE-2

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2 are closely matched at 44.7 and 47.9 on the LLM Stats Score.

Xiaomi · Cognition · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2 are closely matched on the overall LLM Stats Score at 44.7 and 47.9.

In the 3 individual benchmarks reported for both models, SWE-2 wins 2; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Flash

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Sep 2026
  • you need open weights you can self-host or fine-tune

Choose SWE-2

  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 2 of 3 exact shared results

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

Core performance indexes
44.7
#48
47.9
#34
43.0
#54
45.5
#37
34.5
#42
38.7
#26
32.1
#43
35.6
#27
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 3
2 of 3
Input price
$0.14 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.28 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
SWE-2
26.8#35
26.2#38
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

16 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Flash · 4 for SWE-2

3 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Flash outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 4.0), while SWE-2 is better at 2 benchmarks (DeepSWE 1.1, Terminal-Bench 2.1).

SWE-2 shows notably better performance in the majority of benchmarks.

Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Flash specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Flash
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
Cognition
SWE-2
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Nov 06 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports multimodal inputs, whereas SWE-2 does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Text
Images
Audio
Video

SWE-2

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is licensed under MIT, while SWE-2 uses a proprietary license.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

MIT

Open weights

SWE-2

Proprietary

Closed source

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Flash was released on 2026-09-22, while SWE-2 was released on 2026-09-10.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is 0 month newer than SWE-2.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash

Sep 22, 2026

1 months ago

1w newer
SWE-2

Sep 10, 2026

1 months ago

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2 side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Flash
✓ Preferred
SWE-2
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Flash vs SWE-2.

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Flash or SWE-2?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2 are closely matched on the LLM Stats Score at 44.7 and 47.9. MiMo-V2.6-Flash is made by Xiaomi and SWE-2 is made by Cognition. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Flash compare to SWE-2 in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash scores CyberGym: 95.1%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 87.6%, OSWorld-Verified: 80.8%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 77.2%, Toolathlon-Verified: 73.6%. SWE-2 scores Terminal-Bench 2.1: 92.8%, DeepSWE 1.1: 73.0%, FrontierCode 1.1: 50.0%, Terminal-Bench 4.0: 27.3%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash supports 1.0M tokens and SWE-2 supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (44.7 vs 47.9), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs Proprietary). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Flash and SWE-2?

MiMo-V2.6-Flash is developed by Xiaomi and SWE-2 is developed by Cognition.