The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 29.6.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 29.6, ranking #27 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.9 and ranks #27 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.9
#27
29.6
#146
Reasoning
46.3
#31
28.9
#146
Coding
38.8
#18
14.4
#154
Agents
36.3
#20
11.9
#127
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Tool use
29.7#14
5.4#169
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 10 for Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

1 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

946.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 946.0B more parameters than Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB), making it 1278.4% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
74.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
74.0B
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

Both MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) support multimodal inputs.

They are both capable of processing various types of data, offering versatility in application.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) was released on 2026-10-15.

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

3 weeks ago

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

Oct 15, 2026

4 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) has a documented knowledge cutoff of 2026-05-01, while MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date is not specified.

We can confirm Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)'s training data extends to 2026-05-01, but cannot make a direct comparison without MiMo-V2.6-Pro's cutoff date.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

—

Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)

May 2026

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 29.6. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%. Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) scores PinchBench: 87.8%, GPQA: 86.4%, BrowseComp: 66.8%, AA-LCR: 64.1%, MCP Atlas: 52.2%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.9 vs 29.6), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron 3.5 Bolt (74B A9B 24GB) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons