The AI arena is free today

Open Superagent

MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 21.8.

Xiaomi · NVIDIA · Updated for 2026

Which is better?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the overall LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 21.8, ranking #27 overall.

In the 1 individual benchmarks reported for both models, MiMo-V2.6-Pro wins 1; this is a narrower head-to-head signal than the composite indexes.

Based on current LLM Stats indexes, shared benchmarks, pricing, and model metadata for 2026.

Choose MiMo-V2.6-Pro

  • overall performance matters — it scores 48.9 and ranks #27 on LLM Stats
  • your work emphasizes reasoning and coding — it leads those capability indexes
  • you value its reported benchmark strengths — it wins 1 of 1 exact shared results

Choose Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

  • you want the most recent training data — it shipped Oct 2026

At a glance

The differences that matter most.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Xiaomi
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
NVIDIA
Core performance indexes
LLM Stats Score
48.9
#27
21.8
#203
Reasoning
46.3
#31
19.6
#216
Coding
38.8
#18
2.8
#244
Agents
36.3
#20
-1.8
#203
Cost, coverage & limits
Benchmark wins
1 of 1
0 of 1
Input price
$0.43 / M
— / M
Output price
$0.87 / M
— / M
Context window
1,048,576
—

Capability indexes

Additional strengths measured across groups of related public benchmarks

1 shared
Index
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Tool use
29.7#14
-2.2#206
Conservative TrueSkill rating · higher is betterHow scores work

Individual benchmarks

18 reported for MiMo-V2.6-Pro · 10 for Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

1 shared

MiMo-V2.6-Pro outperforms in 1 benchmarks (Terminal-Bench 2.1), while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is better at 0 benchmarks.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro significantly outperforms across most benchmarks.

Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Human preference

Blind head-to-head votes and playground preference scores

Model Size

Parameter count comparison

1016.0B diff

MiMo-V2.6-Pro has 1016.0B more parameters than Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B), making it 25400.0% larger.

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
1.0Tparameters
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
4.0Bparameters
1020.0B
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
4.0B
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Context Window

Maximum input and output token capacity

Only MiMo-V2.6-Pro specifies input context (1,048,576 tokens).

Xiaomi
MiMo-V2.6-Pro
Input1,048,576 tokens
Output- tokens
NVIDIA
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Input- tokens
Output- tokens
Fri Oct 23 2026 • llm-stats.com

Input capabilities

Documented input modalities across available providers

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports multimodal inputs, whereas Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) does not.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro can handle both text and other forms of data like images, making it suitable for multimodal applications.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Text
Images
Audio
Video

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Text
Images
Audio
Video

License

Usage and distribution terms

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is licensed under MIT, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) uses OpenMDW License v1.1.

License differences may affect how you can use these models in commercial or open-source projects.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

MIT

Open weights

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

OpenMDW License v1.1

Open weights

Release Timeline

When each model was launched

MiMo-V2.6-Pro was released on 2026-09-22, while Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) was released on 2026-10-16.

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is 1 month newer than MiMo-V2.6-Pro.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro

Sep 22, 2026

3 weeks ago

Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)

Oct 16, 2026

3 days ago

3w newer

Knowledge Cutoff

When training data ends

Neither model specifies a knowledge cutoff date.

Unable to compare the recency of their training data.

No cutoff dates available

Outputs Comparison

Notice missing or incorrect data?

Judge for yourself.

Run your own prompts against MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) side-by-side, then vote on the output you prefer.

MiMo-V2.6-Pro
✓ Preferred
Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)
Open in Playground

FAQ

Common questions about MiMo-V2.6-Pro vs Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B).

Which is better, MiMo-V2.6-Pro or Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro leads the LLM Stats Score 48.9 to 21.8. MiMo-V2.6-Pro is made by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is made by NVIDIA. The best choice depends on your use case — compare their capability indexes, individual benchmarks, pricing, and limits above.

How does MiMo-V2.6-Pro compare to Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) in benchmarks?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro scores CyberGym: 94.0%, Terminal-Bench 2.1: 89.9%, OSWorld-Verified: 82.0%, MiMo Cyber Bench: 81.7%, Toolathlon-Verified: 76.9%. Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) scores IFBench: 77.9%, GPQA: 72.4%, AA-LCR: 71.0%, SWE-Bench Verified: 59.5%, SciCode: 34.9%.

What are the context window sizes for MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro supports 1.0M tokens and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) supports an unknown number of tokens. A larger context window lets you process longer documents, conversations, or codebases in a single request.

What are the main differences between MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

Key differences include LLM Stats Score (48.9 vs 21.8), multimodal support (yes vs no), licensing (MIT vs OpenMDW License v1.1). See the full comparison above for benchmark-by-benchmark results.

Who makes MiMo-V2.6-Pro and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B)?

MiMo-V2.6-Pro is developed by Xiaomi and Nemotron Labs Dory 1.0 (4B) is developed by NVIDIA.

Related comparisons